City teams of Carthage and Sant Feliu de Llobregat meet to exchange on mapping local food opportunities

This week, the interdisciplinary teams of city officials, local food initiatives, research organisations and members of the public of Sant Feliu de Llobregat (Spain) and Carthage (Tunisia) met online to discuss the status quo of their local food systems. The meeting was co-led by our project partners from the Institute of Organic Farming at BOKU University Vienna and the School of Architecture, Technology and Engineering at the University of Brighton (UoB).

Aim of the workshop-like meeting was to kick-off an exchange between cities that are interested in using UoB’s opportunity mapping process within WP4’s transition pathway method to address specific societal challenges in relation to their local food systems.

Carthage and Sant Feliu de Llobregat share certain general urban characteristics – f.e. the proximity to major urban centres (Tunis and Barcelona) – whilst they differ in others – f.e. the access to water. During the last two years, the city teams in both cities have met regularly to discuss the status quo of their local food systems, collect as much data on their local situation as possible, as well as to extract and agree on where the major challenges lie for implementing resilient, equitable and enjoyable urban (food) futures within their communities.

In preparation of the meeting, Ian and Katrin have taken the two cities’ observations, data and thoughts and systematised them into first drafts of key societal challenges that now make the cities comparable to each other as well as to urban food systems discourses worldwide. Key themes in both cities include the necessity to safeguard and improve local agricultural production as well as access to nature. Sant Feliu de Llobregathas extracted the need to focus on food education, amongst others, whilst Carthage, amongst others, is challenged by the heritage status of many of its open spaces.

Workshop “Hands-on experience with the EdiCitNet toolbox: create, design and explore your Edible City Solution profile.”

During the EdiCitNet annual meeting (2021), ICRA and UL teams offered an interactive workshop to explore the multi facets of the EdiCitNet Toolbox. The workshop aimed to get consortium partners to know better the TOOLBOX, showcase how the TOOLBOX can be useful through its features/tools, promote inclusive /participative testing to enhance the TOOLBOX and thus foster it’s use during and beyond the project. First, we performed an interactive demonstration in which Participants created profiles for their initiatives, they checked how the profile look like and then and played with the tools (assessment and design and planning).

Next, we had an interactive feedback session. We made tree statements in which participants could strongly agree (score 5) and strongly disagree (score 1). Participants strongly agreed that it is easy to create a profile for initiatives in the toolbox online interface (average score 4.3), that the performance tool is useful to explore and compare different initiatives in terms of sustainability urban challenges and ecosystem services (Average score 4) and that the design and planning tool can help people create their own edible city solution (Average score 3.7). We also asked participants to provide words to define how they perceive the toolbox.

Some of the words were innovative, full of possibilities, informative, modern, interactive, useful, helpful, interesting, easy. These results showed that the Toolbox is becoming more and more user friendly and useful, according to the perception of participants of the workshop. Finally, we asked participants What would they like to see in the toolbox and how can we improve what we already have? We are currently working on the received suggestions, which are mainly concerning technical aspects of the tools (e.g. link with other existing databases as for example FAO climate database).

Workshop “Hands-on experience with the EdiCitNet toolbox: create, design and explore your Edible City Solution profile.”

During the EdiCitNet annual meeting (2021), ICRA and UL teams offered an interactive workshop to explore the multi facets of the EdiCitNet Toolbox. The workshop aimed to get consortium partners to know better the TOOLBOX, showcase how the TOOLBOX can be useful through its features/tools, promote inclusive /participative testing to enhance the TOOLBOX and thus foster it’s use during and beyond the project. First, we performed an interactive demonstration in which Participants created profiles for their initiatives, they checked how the profile look like and then and played with the tools (assessment and design and planning).

Next, we had an interactive feedback session. We made tree statements in which participants could strongly agree (score 5) and strongly disagree (score 1). Participants strongly agreed that it is easy to create a profile for initiatives in the toolbox online interface (average score 4.3), that the performance tool is useful to explore and compare different initiatives in terms of sustainability urban challenges and ecosystem services (Average score 4) and that the design and planning tool can help people create their own edible city solution (Average score 3.7). We also asked participants to provide words to define how they perceive the toolbox.

Some of the words were innovative, full of possibilities, informative, modern, interactive, useful, helpful, interesting, easy. These results showed that the Toolbox is becoming more and more user friendly and useful, according to the perception of participants of the workshop. Finally, we asked participants What would they like to see in the toolbox and how can we improve what we already have? We are currently working on the received suggestions, which are mainly concerning technical aspects of the tools (e.g. link with other existing databases as for example FAO climate database).

Workshop “Hands-on experience with the EdiCitNet toolbox: create, design and explore your Edible City Solution profile.”

During the EdiCitNet annual meeting (2021), ICRA and UL teams offered an interactive workshop to explore the multi facets of the EdiCitNet Toolbox. The workshop aimed to get consortium partners to know better the TOOLBOX, showcase how the TOOLBOX can be useful through its features/tools, promote inclusive /participative testing to enhance the TOOLBOX and thus foster it’s use during and beyond the project. First, we performed an interactive demonstration in which Participants created profiles for their initiatives, they checked how the profile look like and then and played with the tools (assessment and design and planning).

Next, we had an interactive feedback session. We made tree statements in which participants could strongly agree (score 5) and strongly disagree (score 1). Participants strongly agreed that it is easy to create a profile for initiatives in the toolbox online interface (average score 4.3), that the performance tool is useful to explore and compare different initiatives in terms of sustainability urban challenges and ecosystem services (Average score 4) and that the design and planning tool can help people create their own edible city solution (Average score 3.7). We also asked participants to provide words to define how they perceive the toolbox.

Some of the words were innovative, full of possibilities, informative, modern, interactive, useful, helpful, interesting, easy. These results showed that the Toolbox is becoming more and more user friendly and useful, according to the perception of participants of the workshop. Finally, we asked participants What would they like to see in the toolbox and how can we improve what we already have? We are currently working on the received suggestions, which are mainly concerning technical aspects of the tools (e.g. link with other existing databases as for example FAO climate database).

Workshop “Hands-on experience with the EdiCitNet toolbox: create, design and explore your Edible City Solution profile.”

During the EdiCitNet annual meeting (2021), ICRA and UL teams offered an interactive workshop to explore the multi facets of the EdiCitNet Toolbox. The workshop aimed to get consortium partners to know better the TOOLBOX, showcase how the TOOLBOX can be useful through its features/tools, promote inclusive /participative testing to enhance the TOOLBOX and thus foster it’s use during and beyond the project. First, we performed an interactive demonstration in which Participants created profiles for their initiatives, they checked how the profile look like and then and played with the tools (assessment and design and planning).

Next, we had an interactive feedback session. We made tree statements in which participants could strongly agree (score 5) and strongly disagree (score 1). Participants strongly agreed that it is easy to create a profile for initiatives in the toolbox online interface (average score 4.3), that the performance tool is useful to explore and compare different initiatives in terms of sustainability urban challenges and ecosystem services (Average score 4) and that the design and planning tool can help people create their own edible city solution (Average score 3.7). We also asked participants to provide words to define how they perceive the toolbox.

Some of the words were innovative, full of possibilities, informative, modern, interactive, useful, helpful, interesting, easy. These results showed that the Toolbox is becoming more and more user friendly and useful, according to the perception of participants of the workshop. Finally, we asked participants What would they like to see in the toolbox and how can we improve what we already have? We are currently working on the received suggestions, which are mainly concerning technical aspects of the tools (e.g. link with other existing databases as for example FAO climate database).

EdiCitNet